By Linda Lovely
I promise. No dogs (or horses or cats or mules or goats or
pigs) will cross over the rainbow bridge in my new Brie Hooker mystery series.
The easiest way for an author to offend (and lose) readers is to allow a
character in her book to kill an animal. Well, maybe a poisonous snake would be
okay, and, if you're Stephen King you can cast a rabid dog as a villain as he did in Cujo.
As an adult, I developed serious allergies to dogs and cats.
So I haven’t had a really close relationship with a pet since Brownie, the
Heinz 57 mix dog I loved as a kid. In adulthood, I’ve been bitten by a dog
while walking and minding my own business. I’ve also been chased by growling
hounds who appear to lust after bicycle tires. These encounters led me to make
one of my animal characters a villain in Dead
Line, the first book in my Smart Women, Dumb Luck romantic thriller series.
The villain dog died.
In my defense, the deceased canine is the villain in a brief
subplot, essential in providing insight into the snarling attack dog’s far more
villainous owner. What’s more, the subplot also features a tail-wagging hero
dog who saves my heroine. Any further explanation could act as a plot spoiler.
So here’s what these two dogs might say if they could talk.
- The Villain Dog
I’m only following orders. I was
abused as a puppy, and I was trained to fight other dogs. When I growl and savage
other dogs, people cheer, and I get food and praise. I’ve been chained up and
beaten. I do what I’ve been trained to do in order to survive.
- The Hero Dog
I love people. Haven’t really met
one I wouldn’t lick. They scratch behind my ears, give me yummy treats, and
help rid me of annoying fleas. Sometimes they talk baby talk to me even though
I’m fully grown. Guess they still think of me as a puppy even though I’m a hard-working
adult. Don’t I chase all those obnoxious squeaky squirrels out of our yard? I’m
brave, too. I’ll do whatever it takes to keep my humans safe.
Okay, I’ve given my dog characters a say they didn’t get in
Dead Line since they weren't afforded speaking parts. Nonetheless, I renew my pledge
to avoid any future canine (or other animal) deaths in my books. I’ll stick to
killing off literary stand-ins for the people who have seriously annoyed me.
So readers why is it that mystery/suspense/thriller authors can
kill kindly, wrinkled grandmothers and clueless, fresh-faced teenagers as often
as their plots and murder counts require, but they should never, never, ever
kill a dog on the page of a novel?
Why do you think the death of a fictional animal seems more
offensive to many mystery readers than the death of a fictional human
being? Like the villain dog in Dead
Line, human villains also may have been abused in their youth and rewarded for
bad behavior, but we can handle their deaths. Is it because dog is man’s best
friend and we have an emotional bond with the species? Is it because humans are supposed to be
the protectors of helpless animals? What’s your opinion?
I'm not entirely sure, but I agree that it will ruin a book/movie/show for me if the animals are killed. It is why I can't watch House of Cards.
ReplyDeleteI quite watching House of Cards after the second season. Too depressing. Don't remember if any animals died in those seasons but it would fit in with the evil theme.
ReplyDelete